Search This Blog

June 8, 2019

Democrats actually DON'T swear to "support, protect and defend the Constitution."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-vote-against-motion-condemning-illegal-immigrant-voting?fbclid=IwAR19bnNc1W2kzz4ROwxP4R5LwzaWh7FNREp8AV4XfOezv8kIU2mzcQbJJ7w
When you hear "support, protect and defend the constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic," do you wonder who they mean by "domestic?" Well, here you go. It's the democrats, the group that subverts, or at least tries to subvert the constitution on a daily basis. They allow antisemitism. They criticize free speech, and constitutional rights. They criticize religion. They attack anyone and anything that opposes their opposition to the constitution. Any they did it again. Illegal aliens are not allowed to vote. They know it. The globalists that control them know it. But they vote for it time and time again. They sit back and watch their push of the Cloward-Piven Strategy. You know, the one where they let masses of illegals enter the country in order to overwhelm the system. Make no mistake, democrats are NOT loyal Americans. If they were, this would never happen. If they were, they would do what they swore to do. Too bad they've been bought and paid for by the likes of Soros, Steyer, and Bloomberg.

June 7, 2019

Democrats are out to destroy us: Paranoia? No. I have proof!!! Read it!


Ever wonder who those people standing behind President Clinton were? Look here: https://totalrehash.com/the-obama-clinton-cloward-piven-legacy/  Ever wonder who the bean-counters are behind the Saul Alinsky plan?  Ever ask "WHY DO THE DEMOCRATS WANT SO MANY ILLEGALS COMING INTO THE COUNTRY?" I know. It's called The Cloward & Piven strategy. Do you think these democrats think for themselves? No. There's no way Swallwell, Pelosi, Schumer, and all the other idiot liberals are so well coordinated, and all spewing the same idiotic ideology; they're controlled by globalists like Soros, Steyer, and Bloomberg. They're told to drone on and on about taking gun rights away, everything is racist, etc. Their goal is to destroy the 1st and 2nd Amendments, and along with it, the Constitution of the United States. They are enemies of the people, masquerading as demo-rats. Do you think the Clinton Foundation is a charity? No. The foundation wants to get "individuals, communities, and organizations to make meaningful contributions to the health of others." Sounds like code for political contributions to globalist assholes to me. So what about all those illegals? Here's a nice shiny picture to explain it. 



Have you ever wondered why democrats say nothing when Rep's Omar and Tlaib spew their anti American and Antisemitic trash? Do you think their goal is to cause hate and discontent in this country. They're doing a great job, but that's not it. Truth is, they want to force a vote on what is considered "hate speech," so they can eliminate the 1st Amendment. It's true. It's all part of the plan. We need to get people "woke" to this, and fast. People are too damn stupid and lazy to see this what it it, and they roll right over and accept Socialism without really knowing what it is and how completely backward it is to American life. Wake up people. Democrats are trying to destroy us. While they're at it, WHERE ARE THE CONSERVATIVES? WHY AREN'T THEY FIGHTING THIS? I'll tell you why. It's the scourge of the RINO's.

Ever wonder why I'm centering the second paragraph? So am I...

June 3, 2019

58 Shot in Chicago, The City that Never Learns. City run like an episode of "The Wire."

https://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/2019/6/1/18648305/chicago-weekend-shootings-52-8-killed

58 people in Chicago got shot over the weekend. 44 if you ask CNN. Why they're downplaying it is another story altogether. This isn't a record. That stands at 72 over the weekend of August 8, 2018, but Chicago never learns. Watching the mayor on TV this morning, I had a flashback to "The Wire." She was talking metrics. Bullshit stats on crime. Can't scapegoat the #NRA on this one. Can't blame a gun maker. The blame falls squarely on city leadership. Liberal democrat leadership. When is the last time they had a conservative in the mayor's office? It was William Hale "Big Bill" Thompson, who left office in 1931. Wait! Now I know why I channeled "The Wire" when I saw the mayor. Chicago really is just like Baltimore (and Detroit, Atlanta, Washington DC, Seattle, San Francisco). Democrats have run those cities into the ground, yet after all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over murders, urban blight, drugs, homelessness, etc., they just elect another, then another. It's Einstein's definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result). Nothing changes. Well, except for corruption and liberal privilege. That just keeps getting worse, along with the problems in the city. Why did they sweep the whole Jussie Smollet racist hoax under the rug? Why did people protest gun violence two years ago but do it in the Miracle Mile instead of where the crime is happening? Did protesting white shoppers have an effect on black crime? No. Did Rahm Emmanuel or Charles Daly or Harold Washington or any of those liberals even make a dent in the issues? No. I've seen "The Wire." Maybe Mayor Lightfoot should also.

April 27, 2019

Thanks for Letting the PC Agenda Ruin the Avengers


https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/04/26/avengers-endgame-star-brie-larson-calls-out-lack-of-diversity-in-marvel-films-we-gotta-move-faster/?__twitter_impression=true#_=_

There we go, another reason to NOT see the movie. If Chris Evans and Mark Ruffalo being sniveling liberal fucks wasn't enough, now this. Do we have to think aggressive, activist PC every damned time a movie comes out? Do they train these idiots to buzzkill everything they can? The Avenger series is already cheesy and sophomoric enough (if you saw any of that POS Age of Ultron you know what I mean), but give me a freaking break. This girl is the first female Captain Marvel, and the movie wasn't bad (yes, all the praise I can muster), but okay little Miss MeToo, not happy with that, let's just crap on the whole Marvel series because you let some gay liberal Variety magazine writer snivel about not seeing an LGBT Marvel character "in his lifetime" and trick you into buying into it and adding your worthless two cents. Please. Why can't superheroes and cartoons and movies just be entertaining? Does every G** da****d thing have to have some PC agenda? Shut the f*** up about it for once. Oh, and thanks for saving me the $50 bucks I would have have dropped at the movie.

April 23, 2019

Right Back at Ya!!!


Do You See The Writing on The Wall Yet?

Obama actually hated America. Still does. So did his entire administration. So does Hillary, Podesta, Soros, Steyer, Romney, Flake, Holder, Sanders, O'Rourke, Tlaib, Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, and the list of anti-American shitheads goes on and on. We have an FBI, DOJ, and CIA that are corrupted by politics and politicians who are clearly, blatantly, disgustingly above-the-law. We are powerless to do anything against these corrupt, immoral globalist parasites that are hell-bent on destroying this country. Hillary Clinton got away with a number of felonies that would have landed anyone else in jail. Thousands of classified emails? Petreus had three confidential hardcopy memos in a locked desk drawer and he got prosecuted. Why? He was a republican and democrats saw him as a threat to Hillary. After that, she was not eligible for a security clearance but they ignored that so she could run for president. I say it's anarchy. I say it's a coup. If you want to see manipulation of the system, look no further than the Somali refugee program. This program needs to end. The United Nations needs to piss-off. The mainstream media needs to stop supporting lawlessness and subversion. Maybe we need a civil war. Maybe then we can set the scales back to even.

JFK was Right: Today he would be a Republican

I can see him spinning in his grave over the state of today's sniveling, anti-American democratic party. As a war hero they would hate him. As a lover of freedom, same, same. They would really hate his love for this country and the belief in personal freedoms and the Constitution. He would piss on Steyer, Soros, and all the other billionaire liberals trying to destroy us.

Liberal Privilege


April 8, 2019

Mexican Immigration Law Definitely Not Quid Pro Quo With the United States.

I know! Let's use Mexico's immigration laws. Here's an explanation of it and what their constitution says about citizens and illegal aliens. Why do we want to give the world to people that don't want to give it to us? Globalists are idiots.

Mexico's Immigration Laws Mexico has stricter immigration laws than the United States of America. UNDER MEXICO'S IMMIGRATION LAW (GENERAL LAW ON POPULATION):
• Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
- Foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress." (Article 32)
- Immigration officials must "ensure" that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (Article 34)
- Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets "the equilibrium of the national demographics," when foreigners are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when "they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy." (Article 37)
- The Secretary of Governance may "suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest." (Article 38)
• Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
- Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
- A National Population Registry keeps track of "every single individual who comprises the population of the country," and verifies each individual's identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
- A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
• Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned: - Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
- Foreigners who sign government documents "with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses" are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)
• Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons: - Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
- Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
- Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico – such as working with out a permit – can also be imprisoned.
• Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,
- "A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally." (Article 123)
- Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
- Foreigners who "attempt against national sovereignty or security" will be deported. (Article 126) • Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
- A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
- Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)

UNDER MEXICO'S CONSTITUTION
• The Mexican constitution expressly forbids non-citizens to participate in the country's political life. Non-citizens are forbidden to participate in demonstrations or express opinions in public about domestic politics. Article 9 states, "only citizens of the Republic may do so to take part in the political affairs of the country." Article 33 is unambiguous: "Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country."
• The Mexican constitution denies fundamental property rights to foreigners. If foreigners wish to have certain property rights, they must renounce the protection of their own governments or risk confiscation. Foreigners are forbidden to own land in Mexico within 100 kilometers of land borders or within 50 kilometers of the coast. Article 27 states, "Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization and Mexican companies have the right to acquire ownership of lands, waters, and their appurtenances, or to obtain concessions for the exploitation of mines or of waters. The State may grant the same right to foreigners, provided they agree before the Ministry of Foreign Relations to consider themselves as nationals in respect to such property, and bind themselves not to invoke the protection of their governments in matters relating thereto; under penalty, in case of noncompliance with this agreement, of forfeiture of the property acquired to the Nation. Under no circumstances may foreigners acquire direct ownership of lands or waters within a zone of one hundred kilometers along the frontiers and of fifty kilometers along the shores of the country." (Emphasis added)
• The Mexican constitution denies equal employment rights to immigrants, even legal ones, in the public sector. "Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners under equality of circumstances for all classes of concessions and for all employment, positions, or commissions of the Government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable. In time of peace no foreigner can serve in the Army nor in the police or public security forces." (Article 32)
• The Mexican constitution guarantees that immigrants will never be treated as real Mexican citizens, even if they are legally naturalized. Article 32 bans foreigners, immigrants, and even naturalized citizens of Mexico from serving as military officers, Mexican-flagged ship and airline crew, and chiefs of seaports and airports: "In order to belong to the National Navy or the Air Force, and to discharge any office or commission, it is required to be a Mexican by birth. This same status is indispensable for captains, pilots, masters, engineers, mechanics, and in general, for all personnel of the crew of any vessel or airship protected by the Mexican merchant flag or insignia. It is also necessary to be Mexican by birth to discharge the position of captain of the port and all services of practique and airport commandant, as well as all functions of customs agent in the Republic."
• An immigrant who becomes a naturalized Mexican citizen can be stripped of his Mexican citizenship if he lives again in the country of his origin for more than five years, under Article 37. Mexican-born citizens risk no such loss.
• Foreign-born, naturalized Mexican citizens may not become federal lawmakers (Article 55), cabinet secretaries (Article 91) or supreme court justices (Article 95).
• The president of Mexico must be a Mexican citizen by birth AND his parents must also be Mexican-born citizens (Article 82), thus giving secondary status to Mexican-born citizens born of immigrants.
• The Mexican constitution singles out "undesirable aliens." Article 11 guarantees federal protection against "undesirable aliens resident in the country."
• The Mexican constitution provides the right of private individuals to make citizen's arrests. Article 16 states, "in cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities." Therefore, the Mexican constitution appears to grant Mexican citizens the right to arrest illegal aliens and hand them over to police for prosecution.
• The Mexican constitution states that foreigners may be expelled for any reason and without due process. According to Article 33, "the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action."

December 18, 2018

Christmas Rant of the Day

We all know "Baby it's cold Outside" is considered offensive to idiot sniveling snowflakes everywhere (while "my neck, my back, my pu**y and my crack" is not). Here are a few more: "White Christmas" just named racist. "Red Nosed" is considered racist. "Let it Snow" considered promoting drug abuse. "Silent Night" considered hate speech toward the hearing impaired. "Jingle Bells" considered white privilege. "We Wish you a Merry Christmas" hate speech against Muslims and Jews. "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year" considered offensive to other holidays. "I saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" offensive to LGBT's, "Merry Christmas Baby" considered offensive toward women, "Please Come Home for Christmas" offensive toward the homeless. We're left with "Grandma Got Run Over By a Reindeer," because although deemed offensive to old people, was praised by PETA for the animal retribution against their abusive human masters, and Feliz Navidad, because Jose Feliciano is not only blind, but Hispanic (although there was some consternation regarding the fact he's a man). Besides, it's a great song. Happy YanaHamaKwansMas, ChrismaHanuKwanzika, or Festivus. Oh, and forget the Peanuts Christmas Special, it promotes Christianity. Or rather, do watch it, since it drives liberals mad.

November 8, 2018

The Problem with Florida Elections :Rant of the Day!

The problem with Florida elections (or any election) is old people, poor people, and immigrants vote for free shit regardless of how the state is doing or what the rest of us need. Yeah, retire and come here, or flee the so-called oppressive place you were from...and turn Florida into the places you came from. Yep. Real freaking smart. Fly that Venezuela flag there, a-hole. Leave the states with high taxes so you can vote for more taxes. Idiots. Then you have incompetent nitwits at polling places (after all, what sort of individual really volunteers for that nonsense), and in the so-called information age, here we are on Thursday still wondering WTF is the final word on the "Goober-natorial" and senate races. I've been so looking forward to the press and the liberals just shutting the F up about all this, and it just keeps going, and going and going. I mean, do i have to worry about that goof Gillum flushing the state down the crapper and Nelson stealing more oxygen from the stinkhole in DC, or are things okay? Do I have to consider my rights and buy up all the guns I can before they're outlawed, or am I good to go, just concentrate on ammo? Can I keep my cliche' and less-than-lucrative boat dealer retirement job, or will the economy tank, business and commercial taxes rise, and my job go the way of the Dodo? I hate politics, and politicians, and pollsters, and political commentators, and pseudo-intellectual liberals, and skimmer hat-wearing party-representing mega-nerds. Just f'ing shut up about it and tell me who in the hell won and who lost. Then let's have the winners claim victory and the losers accept defeat...maturely, with dignity and honor instead of the liberal's two years of sniveling cowardice I've endured since the 2016 elections. Arrghh.

October 29, 2018

Good thing these nitwits are above the law...


My Appeal to Democrats

Look outside. The sky isn't falling. Armed men aren't coming to your door to confiscate your medicare card. You have more money in your retirement account. You are paying fewer taxes. There is more money in your wallet. You are not being forced to pay a tax just because you don't have Obamacare. Unemployment is at a record low for everybody! Fair trade is coming. We will no longer suffer just because we want to be nice, but will do business with other countries the right way. The country is producing more. Crime is down. Respect for our nation overseas, and our police here at home is up. Things are good.

...or not. Think of what you are doing before you vote for a democrat. In Florida, the first thing the democrat candidate said he would do was spend your money. He wants to increase medicaid. Where does he think the money comes from? From us. He said he wants to tax businesses. Why? He wants more of our money to spend on his interests, not ours. What is the consequence of higher corporate taxes? Fewer jobs. Look, I know a lot of people vote one party or another because "I've always voted democrat," or you think you identify with one party over another along ethnic or racial lines. Well, stop doing that. If you think about which party lowered your taxes, created that job, and is doing all the things they said they would do, you can't just go to the polls like a zombie and vote democrat.

Look at the desperation and dishonesty in the democratic party. After crapping on the current president regarding the economy, they rolled out the former president to take credit for it. All lies. People forget the last president said the Gross Domestic Product rate would never go over 2%, and we should accept that as the "new normal." Now it's just under 4% with the current president. I can stand here and say my taxes are lower, but democrats (Schumer and Pelosi) want to repeal the tax cut. They say it only benefits the rich. They lie. I'm not rich and it benefits me.

They say republicans are racist, yet it's them who throw the race card at every chance. (I'll tell you the true definition of racism at the end). They say republicans are violent, yet when the gunman attacked the congressional baseball field and shot republicans, the democrats and their lap-dog media didn't say a word. Eric Holder said kick them when their down. Maxine Waters said get in their faces and scare their wives and children; Hillary said they can't be civil to anyone that doesn't believe what they believe. Pelosi said if there were any "casualties," then so be it. Madonna said she wanted to "blow up the White House." Kathy Griffin displayed the severed head of our freely elected president. But it's republicans that are violent. I don't think so.

Democrats talk like socialism is a good thing. It's not. They want you to think it's like social media. It's not. Socialism means the government owns everything. No matter how hard you work, it all goes to the government. No matter if you want to give your family everything, or you lay around all day dependent on the government, it doesn't matter. They own everything, they control everything, they assign work to you based on what they think you're good for, they tell you where to live, what to do, how many kids you can have, and that you are not an individual. All you do is for the good of the state. Yep, look at Venezuela to see how well that's working. A former bus driver sits in a palace while people with masters and doctorate degrees stand in line for toilet paper and guards watch over the lawn at the palace because people were eating the grass. How does that look on Facebook?

Democrats are hateful, lawless keepers of the double standard. Don't be like them. Don't elect them and let them continue this horrible activity. They smear and slander Judge Kavanaugh using a woman that had absolutely no proof (and who got paid to testify), while Senator Booker and Congressman Ellison have provable sexual assault claims against them but democrats think that's okay, they're democrats, so it's fine. More than ten women accused President Clinton of sexual assault, so Hillary and her cronies slandered and destroyed them, but now, they say every woman should be believed. Senator Blumenthal lied about serving in Vietnam, but he sat in judgment over Justice Kavanaugh. Senator Feinstein outed that woman, plain and simple. She threw her to the wolves for her own political gain. Any consequences? Of course not, she's a democrat. Nancy Pelosi had no idea what was in Obamacare, saying "we have to pass it to know what's in it," but according to her, she knows what's best for the American people more so than they (we) do. A white woman insists she's a native American and benefits from her lies. They threw Bradley Manning in jail for divulging classified information, but they let Hillary run for president. By law she shouldn't have been able to run, but she is above the law. You aren't. I'm not. She is. Oh, and the fact Manning is LGBT is of no concern to them. They talk a good game, but it's all bullshit. They let a wife beater run for congress in South Carolina. They let the Grand Wizard of the KKK serve for 40 years in congress. They favored a known sponsor of terrorism over Israel. They speak ill of republicans as they pose for pictures with Harvey Weinstein. They dumped guns on the street in the southwest (operation fast and furious) but covered it up, then said the rest of us should be disarmed. They put a healthcare law in place where seniors got benefits paid for by a tax on the young. When Trump eliminated that tax, democrats started their lies about how republicans hate people with pre-existing conditions. It's just not true.

They want to take our guns away, like we're not adult enough to handle them. Sure, make them illegal, it worked so well for heroin and cocaine. Diane Feinstein says no one should own a gun. Hypocrite. She has a concealed carry permit and carried as a city councilwoman in San Francisco. How many others in government and Hollywood have armed guards and high fences?

Democrats say republicans are responsible for red tide and water pollution. Not true. The first reported case of red tide in Florida was in 1844. It was even earlier than that in other places.

So, to recap, a vote for democrats is a vote for less money, higher taxes, less freedom, a weaker economy, weaker country, and an overall bad life. Oh, and here's the true definition of racism; identifying an ethnic group and giving someone in need just enough money to survive. Not giving them the skills required for success or creating the conditions for that person to maybe start their own business and become a success, who can then turn and help the next needy person. No. It's giving them just enough to survive, and thus guaranteeing that person's dependence on them. That's what democrats do. They identify minorities, mostly African Americans, and give them just enough to survive, guaranteeing they will always vote for democrats. This year, they added 300,000 Puerto Ricans who came from Puerto Rico to Florida to the long list of minorities they do this to. Well, brace yourself. In case you haven't figured it out. It's called slavery. There might not be any whips and chains, or cottn fields, but it's enslavement nonetheless. The trouble is, people don't realize it, especially the 300,000 Puerto Ricans voting here for the first time. It doesn't matter that it happens in places like Baltimore or Detroit instead of Alabama or Mississippi, it's slavery.

Please, this country is doing well. The lies the media tells you are just that...lies. Don't be a drone. Think for yourself. Ask yourself if you are better off now. You are. Vote republican. Keep the prosperity going. Keep freedom going. Stop democrat hate. Stop democrat lies. Please.

October 13, 2018

Here is the Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement Form for All to See

https://fas.org/sgp/isoo/new_sf312.pdf

I am way, way past sick and tired of Hillary Clinton's "above the law" status. She violated every non-disclosure requirement we insist privates in the army adhere to, yet nothing happened to her. Fast forward to now and all the corrupt media outlets in this country are making sure to include the words "at her request" in all their "newzz" articles. THIS IS SOME CORRUPT BULLSHIT AND IT NEEDS TO STOP. Her clearance should have been revoked prior to the election. She shouldn't have even been authorized to run for president because SHE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO GET A CLEARANCE. Well, read the nondisclosure agreement and maybe some of you will understand why this makes me so mad I could scream. Arrgghhh.

September 29, 2018

Welcome the Future Demise of the Florida Stone Crab Industry

http://myfwc.com/fishing/saltwater/commercial/stone-crab/
Now there's greed, then there's commercial fisherman greed. First, take a resource that doesn't belong to them. Next, adopt the "I gotta get mine, screw everybody else" attitude. Follow that by installing some commercial-friendly scientists on the fish and wildlife council and Marine Fisheries service, and you set the conditions for ruination of a resource. What's my proof? I'll just go with the low-handing fruit. Two reasons. First, last year's harvest was terrible. Quality was low, prices were sky-high, and it just wasn't good. Second, the regulations for harvesting stone crab claws allow for the taking of both claws (if they are of legal size). Now maybe it's just me, but taking both claws off a crab seems like some seriously short-minded, "gotta get mine while I can get it," greedy ignorant shit. Crabs need their claws to defend themselves from predators and put food in their mouths. Seems kinda basic; no arms means no protection and no way to feet itself. We're not talking about little Harry shoving his face into his birthday cake. The stone crab is by nature a predator crab. Taking both claws is asking it to change it's very nature and become a scavenger. But don't just take my word for it. Look at the FWC website. Like this: "Both claws of a Stone Crab may be harvested if they are of legal size. Although it is currently lawful to harvest both of a stone crab's claws, this practice leaves the stone crab with few alternatives to defend itself from predators. Although the crab can still obtain minimal amounts of food with no claws, having one claw (if the other one is harvested) will help the crab obtain greater amounts of food in a shorter amount of time. Stone crabs (like other crustaceans) have the ability to grow back their claws, but this process requires a large amount of energy in the form of food. The quicker the crab can obtain the energy required to molt and grow its lost claw, the sooner this renewable delicacy will have another claw to replace the missing one." So I ask you, if they know the practice leaves the crabs undefended, why do they allow it? Answer? Because the short-sighted commercial fisherman are more concerned about getting theirs than protecting the resource so they make sure their lawmaker and scientist friends set things up their way. It's stupid, yes, but we're not dealing with brain surgeons. Sure, crabs regrow their claws, but it takes several molt cycles to do it, and guess what it takes; Yep, enough food to get the energy to molt! They know that, yet allow the harvest of both claws. It's dumb. Maybe they need a more literal example. Maybe something extreme. I tell you what, let's get a couple crabbers, lop one arm off one guy, and both off the other, set them down in front of a bowl of soup and see how they do. Better yet, add a guy with a rolled-up newspaper that wants to hit them while they eat and let them figure out why taking both claws is really freaking stupid. The outlook for this year by the scientists is a fairly rosy one. The outlook by people that live here and see the harvest year to year is far worse. Why not get some common sense and stop the double claw harvest. Why not try to sustain the resource instead of making it comparable to musical chairs. As the crabs go, so shall the fishermen. They know it. They just can't control themselves.