Search This Blog

June 8, 2019

Democrats actually DON'T swear to "support, protect and defend the Constitution."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-vote-against-motion-condemning-illegal-immigrant-voting?fbclid=IwAR19bnNc1W2kzz4ROwxP4R5LwzaWh7FNREp8AV4XfOezv8kIU2mzcQbJJ7w
When you hear "support, protect and defend the constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic," do you wonder who they mean by "domestic?" Well, here you go. It's the democrats, the group that subverts, or at least tries to subvert the constitution on a daily basis. They allow antisemitism. They criticize free speech, and constitutional rights. They criticize religion. They attack anyone and anything that opposes their opposition to the constitution. Any they did it again. Illegal aliens are not allowed to vote. They know it. The globalists that control them know it. But they vote for it time and time again. They sit back and watch their push of the Cloward-Piven Strategy. You know, the one where they let masses of illegals enter the country in order to overwhelm the system. Make no mistake, democrats are NOT loyal Americans. If they were, this would never happen. If they were, they would do what they swore to do. Too bad they've been bought and paid for by the likes of Soros, Steyer, and Bloomberg.

June 7, 2019

Democrats are out to destroy us: Paranoia? No. I have proof!!! Read it!


Ever wonder who those people standing behind President Clinton were? Look here: https://totalrehash.com/the-obama-clinton-cloward-piven-legacy/  Ever wonder who the bean-counters are behind the Saul Alinsky plan?  Ever ask "WHY DO THE DEMOCRATS WANT SO MANY ILLEGALS COMING INTO THE COUNTRY?" I know. It's called The Cloward & Piven strategy. Do you think these democrats think for themselves? No. There's no way Swallwell, Pelosi, Schumer, and all the other idiot liberals are so well coordinated, and all spewing the same idiotic ideology; they're controlled by globalists like Soros, Steyer, and Bloomberg. They're told to drone on and on about taking gun rights away, everything is racist, etc. Their goal is to destroy the 1st and 2nd Amendments, and along with it, the Constitution of the United States. They are enemies of the people, masquerading as demo-rats. Do you think the Clinton Foundation is a charity? No. The foundation wants to get "individuals, communities, and organizations to make meaningful contributions to the health of others." Sounds like code for political contributions to globalist assholes to me. So what about all those illegals? Here's a nice shiny picture to explain it. 



Have you ever wondered why democrats say nothing when Rep's Omar and Tlaib spew their anti American and Antisemitic trash? Do you think their goal is to cause hate and discontent in this country. They're doing a great job, but that's not it. Truth is, they want to force a vote on what is considered "hate speech," so they can eliminate the 1st Amendment. It's true. It's all part of the plan. We need to get people "woke" to this, and fast. People are too damn stupid and lazy to see this what it it, and they roll right over and accept Socialism without really knowing what it is and how completely backward it is to American life. Wake up people. Democrats are trying to destroy us. While they're at it, WHERE ARE THE CONSERVATIVES? WHY AREN'T THEY FIGHTING THIS? I'll tell you why. It's the scourge of the RINO's.

Ever wonder why I'm centering the second paragraph? So am I...

June 3, 2019

58 Shot in Chicago, The City that Never Learns. City run like an episode of "The Wire."

https://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/2019/6/1/18648305/chicago-weekend-shootings-52-8-killed

58 people in Chicago got shot over the weekend. 44 if you ask CNN. Why they're downplaying it is another story altogether. This isn't a record. That stands at 72 over the weekend of August 8, 2018, but Chicago never learns. Watching the mayor on TV this morning, I had a flashback to "The Wire." She was talking metrics. Bullshit stats on crime. Can't scapegoat the #NRA on this one. Can't blame a gun maker. The blame falls squarely on city leadership. Liberal democrat leadership. When is the last time they had a conservative in the mayor's office? It was William Hale "Big Bill" Thompson, who left office in 1931. Wait! Now I know why I channeled "The Wire" when I saw the mayor. Chicago really is just like Baltimore (and Detroit, Atlanta, Washington DC, Seattle, San Francisco). Democrats have run those cities into the ground, yet after all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over murders, urban blight, drugs, homelessness, etc., they just elect another, then another. It's Einstein's definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result). Nothing changes. Well, except for corruption and liberal privilege. That just keeps getting worse, along with the problems in the city. Why did they sweep the whole Jussie Smollet racist hoax under the rug? Why did people protest gun violence two years ago but do it in the Miracle Mile instead of where the crime is happening? Did protesting white shoppers have an effect on black crime? No. Did Rahm Emmanuel or Charles Daly or Harold Washington or any of those liberals even make a dent in the issues? No. I've seen "The Wire." Maybe Mayor Lightfoot should also.

April 27, 2019

Thanks for Letting the PC Agenda Ruin the Avengers


https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/04/26/avengers-endgame-star-brie-larson-calls-out-lack-of-diversity-in-marvel-films-we-gotta-move-faster/?__twitter_impression=true#_=_

There we go, another reason to NOT see the movie. If Chris Evans and Mark Ruffalo being sniveling liberal fucks wasn't enough, now this. Do we have to think aggressive, activist PC every damned time a movie comes out? Do they train these idiots to buzzkill everything they can? The Avenger series is already cheesy and sophomoric enough (if you saw any of that POS Age of Ultron you know what I mean), but give me a freaking break. This girl is the first female Captain Marvel, and the movie wasn't bad (yes, all the praise I can muster), but okay little Miss MeToo, not happy with that, let's just crap on the whole Marvel series because you let some gay liberal Variety magazine writer snivel about not seeing an LGBT Marvel character "in his lifetime" and trick you into buying into it and adding your worthless two cents. Please. Why can't superheroes and cartoons and movies just be entertaining? Does every G** da****d thing have to have some PC agenda? Shut the f*** up about it for once. Oh, and thanks for saving me the $50 bucks I would have have dropped at the movie.

April 23, 2019

Right Back at Ya!!!


Do You See The Writing on The Wall Yet?

Obama actually hated America. Still does. So did his entire administration. So does Hillary, Podesta, Soros, Steyer, Romney, Flake, Holder, Sanders, O'Rourke, Tlaib, Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, and the list of anti-American shitheads goes on and on. We have an FBI, DOJ, and CIA that are corrupted by politics and politicians who are clearly, blatantly, disgustingly above-the-law. We are powerless to do anything against these corrupt, immoral globalist parasites that are hell-bent on destroying this country. Hillary Clinton got away with a number of felonies that would have landed anyone else in jail. Thousands of classified emails? Petreus had three confidential hardcopy memos in a locked desk drawer and he got prosecuted. Why? He was a republican and democrats saw him as a threat to Hillary. After that, she was not eligible for a security clearance but they ignored that so she could run for president. I say it's anarchy. I say it's a coup. If you want to see manipulation of the system, look no further than the Somali refugee program. This program needs to end. The United Nations needs to piss-off. The mainstream media needs to stop supporting lawlessness and subversion. Maybe we need a civil war. Maybe then we can set the scales back to even.

JFK was Right: Today he would be a Republican

I can see him spinning in his grave over the state of today's sniveling, anti-American democratic party. As a war hero they would hate him. As a lover of freedom, same, same. They would really hate his love for this country and the belief in personal freedoms and the Constitution. He would piss on Steyer, Soros, and all the other billionaire liberals trying to destroy us.

Liberal Privilege


April 8, 2019

Mexican Immigration Law Definitely Not Quid Pro Quo With the United States.

I know! Let's use Mexico's immigration laws. Here's an explanation of it and what their constitution says about citizens and illegal aliens. Why do we want to give the world to people that don't want to give it to us? Globalists are idiots.

Mexico's Immigration Laws Mexico has stricter immigration laws than the United States of America. UNDER MEXICO'S IMMIGRATION LAW (GENERAL LAW ON POPULATION):
• Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
- Foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress." (Article 32)
- Immigration officials must "ensure" that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (Article 34)
- Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets "the equilibrium of the national demographics," when foreigners are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when "they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy." (Article 37)
- The Secretary of Governance may "suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest." (Article 38)
• Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
- Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
- A National Population Registry keeps track of "every single individual who comprises the population of the country," and verifies each individual's identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
- A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
• Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned: - Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
- Foreigners who sign government documents "with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses" are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)
• Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons: - Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
- Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
- Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico – such as working with out a permit – can also be imprisoned.
• Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,
- "A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally." (Article 123)
- Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
- Foreigners who "attempt against national sovereignty or security" will be deported. (Article 126) • Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
- A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
- Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)

UNDER MEXICO'S CONSTITUTION
• The Mexican constitution expressly forbids non-citizens to participate in the country's political life. Non-citizens are forbidden to participate in demonstrations or express opinions in public about domestic politics. Article 9 states, "only citizens of the Republic may do so to take part in the political affairs of the country." Article 33 is unambiguous: "Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country."
• The Mexican constitution denies fundamental property rights to foreigners. If foreigners wish to have certain property rights, they must renounce the protection of their own governments or risk confiscation. Foreigners are forbidden to own land in Mexico within 100 kilometers of land borders or within 50 kilometers of the coast. Article 27 states, "Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization and Mexican companies have the right to acquire ownership of lands, waters, and their appurtenances, or to obtain concessions for the exploitation of mines or of waters. The State may grant the same right to foreigners, provided they agree before the Ministry of Foreign Relations to consider themselves as nationals in respect to such property, and bind themselves not to invoke the protection of their governments in matters relating thereto; under penalty, in case of noncompliance with this agreement, of forfeiture of the property acquired to the Nation. Under no circumstances may foreigners acquire direct ownership of lands or waters within a zone of one hundred kilometers along the frontiers and of fifty kilometers along the shores of the country." (Emphasis added)
• The Mexican constitution denies equal employment rights to immigrants, even legal ones, in the public sector. "Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners under equality of circumstances for all classes of concessions and for all employment, positions, or commissions of the Government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable. In time of peace no foreigner can serve in the Army nor in the police or public security forces." (Article 32)
• The Mexican constitution guarantees that immigrants will never be treated as real Mexican citizens, even if they are legally naturalized. Article 32 bans foreigners, immigrants, and even naturalized citizens of Mexico from serving as military officers, Mexican-flagged ship and airline crew, and chiefs of seaports and airports: "In order to belong to the National Navy or the Air Force, and to discharge any office or commission, it is required to be a Mexican by birth. This same status is indispensable for captains, pilots, masters, engineers, mechanics, and in general, for all personnel of the crew of any vessel or airship protected by the Mexican merchant flag or insignia. It is also necessary to be Mexican by birth to discharge the position of captain of the port and all services of practique and airport commandant, as well as all functions of customs agent in the Republic."
• An immigrant who becomes a naturalized Mexican citizen can be stripped of his Mexican citizenship if he lives again in the country of his origin for more than five years, under Article 37. Mexican-born citizens risk no such loss.
• Foreign-born, naturalized Mexican citizens may not become federal lawmakers (Article 55), cabinet secretaries (Article 91) or supreme court justices (Article 95).
• The president of Mexico must be a Mexican citizen by birth AND his parents must also be Mexican-born citizens (Article 82), thus giving secondary status to Mexican-born citizens born of immigrants.
• The Mexican constitution singles out "undesirable aliens." Article 11 guarantees federal protection against "undesirable aliens resident in the country."
• The Mexican constitution provides the right of private individuals to make citizen's arrests. Article 16 states, "in cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities." Therefore, the Mexican constitution appears to grant Mexican citizens the right to arrest illegal aliens and hand them over to police for prosecution.
• The Mexican constitution states that foreigners may be expelled for any reason and without due process. According to Article 33, "the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action."